In more recent times, if an ancestor was shipwrecked on a large liner there is a good chance that the event was well-documented, even that a passenger list was published in the press. I am thinking of the obvious famous vessels like Titanic and Lusitania, though there are less publicised wrecks such as that of the American in the1880s. The survivors of the latter ship had to undergo a second shipwreck immediately after the first, on the ship which was supposedly taking them to safety. Not a good day for those on board.
molegenealogy.blogspot.co.za/2010/05/shipwreck-reports-for-family-history.html
The Waratah, which mysteriously disappeared off the South African coast in 1909, was the topic of numerous reports in local and international press for many months and the list of her passengers was published several times. Despite these facts being to hand, there are frequent claims made by alleged descendants that their ancestor was among those on board the fated ship.
It is evidence of a strange desire to be associated in some way with a famous and tragic incident - rather like descendants who hold to it, buckle and thong, that their forebear fought at Rorke's Drift in 1879 when it is perfectly clear from documentary evidence that he was not among that small courageous band of British soldiers.
What particular claim to fame it might be for an ancestor to have been lost on the Titanic or the Waratah remains nebulous, but there's no doubt that a certain glamour attaches to such an ancestor.
I sometimes receive queries from family historians who ask why shipwrecks are relevant to the topic of genealogy. Clearly the loss of an individual in a wreck certainly was relevant to his or her family and undoubtedly changed the course of the latters' lives. Also, the mere fact of an ancestor dying in this manner means that information will be available - on the more well-known vessels at least. All grist to the family historian's mill.
On rare occasions details may emerge about an ancestor wrecked on a little-known vessel. An example was finding mention of Sturges Bourne Bell, son of Captain William Bell, who was shipwrecked off a collier near the coast of Spain in 1873. This reference led to the discovery of further information on this obscure and elusive forebear.
molegenealogy.blogspot.co.za/2014/01/the-shipwrecked-mariner-and-spanish.html
Pages
Showing posts with label Sturges Bourne Bell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sturges Bourne Bell. Show all posts
Friday, February 5, 2016
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
The Shipwrecked Mariner and the Spanish Ladies 1873
Sturges Bourne Bell was born
in Port Natal on 17 July 1852 to Captain William Bell and his wife Mary Ann nee
Caithness . Apart from his birth and baptism, records concerning Sturges
were scarce.
However, an unusual pair of
forenames can be an advantage when tracing an ancestor - especially in that mine
of information, contemporary newspapers. So it proved in the case of Sturges
Bourne Bell.*
Apparently he stayed with family tradition and became a mariner. In
1873 he turns up as crew member on the collier Beckton sailing from Cardiff to Malta,
when on the night of 28 November this screw steamer struck a sunken reef in
heavy fog about three miles off the coast of Spain. There was a strong gale
whipping up the sea and within minutes it was evident that the ship would soon
break up.
The crew launched a lifeboat
but it was immediately swamped, with the loss of eleven men. An attempt to
launch the jolly-boat also failed. Several seamen including the mate leapt into
the waves or were washed off the vessel. Only the captain and Bell were left on deck. Bell
managed to get a lifebelt to the captain, who could not swim, but the captain was
swept away and Bell
then decided to try and make for land, stripping off all his clothing except
his shirt.
As he swam he called out for
any possible survivors in the water and was answered by the mate, the two men
swimming together for some distance. When the mate’s strength began to fail,
Bell found him a plank and the mate clung to this but was unable to continue,
asking Bell to go and see his wife and five children to tell them how he’d
died. Later the mate’s body was washed up, still clasping the plank. The bodies
of seven other seamen and that of the ship’s cook followed.
It had been a dramatic
wreck, with over 20 lives lost, Bell
being the sole survivor. He seems to have acquitted himself well and his
actions in assisting others showed some heroism. Accounts were published in
several British newspapers, identifying him as Sturges Bourne Bell, aged 20,
from Port Natal. He is variously described in the reports as Ordinary Seaman
and Able Seaman.
![]() |
Crew members listed: Central Press 17 Dec 1873 |
According to one news column, when Bell left Plymouth
he headed for London
but at that point he drops out of sight. It hasn’t yet been established whether
his family in Natal
ever saw him again or heard about the shipwreck and his miraculous escape from
the deep.
As Sturges Bourne Bell
sailed away from the shores of Spain ,
perhaps he whistled the old Navy refrain:
‘Farewell and adieu to you, Spanish Ladies,
Farewell and adieu to you, ladies ofSpain ;
For we've received orders for to sail for oldEngland ,
But we hope in a short time to see you again.’
Farewell and adieu to you, ladies of
For we've received orders for to sail for old
But we hope in a short time to see you again.’
![]() |
| Spanish ladies: Raquel and Manuela by Sir William Russell Flint |
* For more on the origin of
his forenames:
Acknowlegement
Tom Sheldon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






