Aims of the CFS
The Children’s Friend Society’s
intention was to provide agricultural and other employment to pauper children
between the ages of eight and sixteen, estimating that in London in 1830 there were not less than 15
000 juveniles who were totally destitute.
Initially, sending the children
overseas wasn’t envisaged and Brenton himself was not in favour of that
concept. His aim was to remove the children from their disadvantaged
backgrounds, to rehabilitate them, provide them with training, and subsequently
to indenture them in various occupations until they were able to become
industrious, self-supporting citizens in
their own country.
Circumstances altered the case. A
labour surplus in Britain
meant that the CFS had difficulty placing their charges in suitable situations.
At the same time, the abolition of slavery in the British colonies in 1833
brought about an acute labour shortage at the Cape of Good
Hope . Sending the children to the Cape
appeared to be a solution to these problems. It was also in the interests of
Empire to increase the British population of the Colony.
Action
In October 1832 the CFS began
advertising in the Graham’s Town Journal for masters at the Cape
who might require the services of juvenile emigrants as apprentices. At a
meeting of the Society the following January, it was decided that twenty of the
children then living at the West Ham asylum should be sent to the Cape on the
Charles Kerr. According to reports in The Times, these boys were present at the
meeting and ‘all held up their hands in favour of emigrating’ (as if they knew what emigrating meant). Half the cost of
sending the group to the Colony would be borne by the Government.
The experiment was successfully
carried out and Brenton began approaching the Poor Law guardians in various London parishes to contribute financial aid towards
sending their paupers out to the Cape , The
Times announcing in March 1833 that the Parish of St Marylebone had advanced
£200. Soon afterwards, a second ship, the Maria, left London
for Algoa Bay
(Port Elizabeth ),
with another batch of twenty boys.
This pattern continued and public support was indicated by the donations received by the
CFS. By May 1834, 213 boys had been sent to the Cape Colony .
In the same year, the Society attracted the attention of the Princess Victoria
(she would become Queen in 1837). Under her Royal patronage an institution for
female juveniles was established at Chiswick and girls joined the ranks of
indentured children being shipped to the Cape .
Victoria visited the Chiswick asylum and recorded her favourable impression in her journal: ‘it is a most interesting and delightful establishment … it is for poor vagrant girls who are received under the age of fifteen and Miss Murray says that they have never had a girl six months who did not become a perfectly good child. When they have become quite good and can read and write and do work of all kinds necessary for the home they are sent abroad … where they are apprenticed and become excellent servants’.
An example of the 'tough love' of the Victorian era: the pious iron fist in the silken sentimental glove. What is the definition of a 'perfectly good child'? One who is forced by circumstance to submit to the power of those in authority and to be 'sent abroad' regardless of personal wishes?
The young Queen Victoria |
An example of the 'tough love' of the Victorian era: the pious iron fist in the silken sentimental glove. What is the definition of a 'perfectly good child'? One who is forced by circumstance to submit to the power of those in authority and to be 'sent abroad' regardless of personal wishes?
To be continued
a 'perfectly good child' would probably be one subscribing to the Victorian tenet 'seen but not heard'. In this instance, these children did indeed have no 'voice'. I wonder what parents they in turn made?
ReplyDeleteLater, their 'voices' were heard in the CFS reports, and continue to reverberate despite time and distance. 'I do not like my mistress,' says young Henry Vine, 'she is constantly boxing my ears'. Mole
ReplyDelete